Chidimma Adetshina: The Beauty Queen at the Center of a Citizenship and Deportation Controversy in South Africa
Chidimma Adetshina, a 25-year-old beauty queen and law student, has become the focal point of a high-profile legal battle in South Africa, where authorities are seeking her deportation after declaring her a prohibited person in 2024.
Adetshina, whose mother has Mozambican roots and whose father is Nigerian, has consistently maintained that she was born in South Africa and has accused authorities of targeting her unfairly.
Her case has drawn international attention, particularly amid rising concerns over xenophobia and the treatment of migrants in the country.
Legal Challenges and Citizenship Dispute
Adetshina’s legal troubles began when she participated in the 2024 Miss South Africa pageant. Questions about her citizenship arose due to her parents’ nationalities, leading to an investigation into her status.
Following this scrutiny, she was stripped of her South African identity documents in 2024, a move that left her unable to prove her citizenship. South African officials later alleged that she had re-entered the country unlawfully via a Mozambican border post, a claim she denies.
Also Read: Nigeria Digital Training Academy 2026: Free AI, Tech Skills for Nigerians, How to Apply
In June 2025, Adetshina was arrested and subsequently released on a warning after being accused of illegal re-entry. The government’s legal bid to detain her was postponed until February 2027, giving her time to challenge the home affairs department’s decision to deport her. Until then, she remains a free woman.
During a hearing in Cape Town, Adetshina addressed the court, stating,
“There has been an attempt by the South African authorities to make an example of me with this case. I remind everyone that I was born in South Africa. I have applied through the proper legal channels to have my status and citizenship determined.”
She also criticized the role of xenophobia and misinformation in shaping public perception and treatment of individuals, particularly in light of protests outside the courthouse.
The demonstrations were led by March and March, an anti-migrant group advocating for the deportation of undocumented migrants. Protesters reportedly chased her car as she left the courthouse, amplifying the hostility surrounding her case.
Family Background and Early Life
Adetshina’s parents, Anabela Rungo (her mother) and a Nigerian father, have both been central to the controversy. Rungo, who has Mozambican roots, had her South African citizenship revoked in 2025 after allegations of identity fraud to obtain nationality.
Adetshina has argued that her birth in South Africa should entitle her to citizenship, though South African law requires at least one parent to be a citizen or permanent resident for this to apply.
Adetshina has described her upbringing in South Africa, stating in interviews that she was born in Soweto, a township near Johannesburg, and later moved to Cape Town.
Her participation in the Miss South Africa pageant brought her national attention, but it also exposed her to criticism over her eligibility to compete.
Many questioned her South African identity given her parents’ backgrounds, prompting her to withdraw from the competition.
Following her withdrawal, Adetshina was invited to participate in the Miss Universe Nigeria pageant, which she won.
This move further complicated her legal situation, as South African authorities later claimed she had applied for a South African visa while in Nigeria and had obtained Nigerian passports for herself and her son.
These actions, according to officials, implied that she was not a South African citizen.
Government’s Arguments and Legal Proceedings
The South African home affairs department has argued that Adetshina’s actions—such as applying for a visa while abroad and obtaining Nigerian passports—undermine her claim to South African citizenship. Authorities also contend that her re-entry into the country via Mozambique was illegal, though Adetshina has not confirmed these details publicly.
The government’s case against her was postponed to February 2027, allowing time for her legal team to challenge the home affairs department’s decision.
Until then, Adetshina remains free, though the uncertainty surrounding her status continues to cast a shadow over her life and career.
In a statement to the News24 site, officials emphasized that Adetshina’s actions were inconsistent with someone claiming South African citizenship.
They argued that her behavior, including leaving the country and later re-entering, demonstrated a lack of ties to South Africa, despite her claims of being born there.
Public Reaction and Broader Implications
Adetshina’s case has sparked a broader debate about citizenship laws, xenophobia, and the treatment of migrants in South Africa. Her story has resonated with many who see her as a victim of systemic bias, particularly given the scrutiny faced by individuals with foreign-born parents.
The protests outside the courthouse, led by groups like March and March, reflect growing tensions around immigration and national identity in the country.
Adetshina has used her platform to speak out against these issues, stating,
“We should not allow xenophobia and misinformation to determine how people are going to be treated.”
Her case has also highlighted the complexities of South Africa’s citizenship laws, which do not automatically grant nationality to individuals born in the country unless specific conditions are met.