Advertisements
Apostle Suleman Criticises Leadership, Says Prayer Cannot Replace Good Governance
The General Overseer of Omega Fire Ministries International, Johnson Suleman, has stated that no nation can achieve meaningful progress under poor leadership, warning that spiritual efforts alone cannot compensate for governance failures.
The cleric made the remarks during his Easter Sunday sermon on April 5, where he addressed national concerns over insecurity and governance. Ejes Gist News reports that Suleman expressed strong dissatisfaction with the conduct of political leaders, accusing them of showing limited sensitivity to the hardships faced by citizens.
Advertisements
Also Read: Bandits Attack Churches in Kaduna, Kill Worshippers During Easter Service
Concerns Over Insecurity and Public Response
Referencing recent killings in Jos North Local Government Area, Johnson Suleman criticised what he described as misplaced priorities among government officials.
Advertisements
He questioned the practice of public officials engaging in media appearances during periods of mourning, suggesting that such actions undermine the gravity of national tragedies.
According to him, the increasing frequency of violent attacks and loss of lives has contributed to a growing sense of desensitisation among Nigerians.
“Prayer Cannot Replace Leadership” – Suleman
During the sermon, Suleman stated that prayer alone is insufficient in addressing systemic leadership failures, emphasising the role of governance in national development.
He said citizens who elect ineffective leaders may ultimately face prolonged hardship, adding that the only prayer in such circumstances may be for endurance rather than immediate relief.
Rising Concerns Over Public Desensitisation
The cleric further observed that repeated exposure to violence has altered public reactions to tragedy, with incidents that previously attracted prolonged national attention now receiving limited response.
He warned that the normalisation of violence risks eroding empathy within society, noting that public discourse has increasingly shifted towards debating casualty figures rather than addressing underlying issues.
Suleman also criticised what he described as attempts to manage public perception through media engagement during crises, arguing that such actions reflect a lack of empathy for affected communities.
