FG Drops One Charge Against IPOB Leader, Nnamdi Kanu

0
Nnamdi Kanu, IPOB Leader

The Federal Government has dropped one of the charges against detained Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader Nnamdi Kanu.

The Human Rights Lawyer, Mike Ozekhome (SAN), who is leading the delegation of legal practitioners representing the IPOB leader, has asked the Court of Appeal in Abuja to dismiss the remaining charges due to a lack of credibility.

Pay Attention To Jigawa canoe mishap Update: Death Toll Rises To 7

Ministry of Foreign Affairs Massive Job Recruitment Exercise 2022 - 132 Positions

The hearing at the Court of Appeal began around 10 a.m. on Tuesday, with Kanu’s legal team mounting a strong defence against allegations of terrorism and treasonable felony.

It should be noted that Kanu was re-arrested by the federal government on an amended 15-count charge bordering on treasonable felony. On May 28, however, the trial judge, Binta Nyako of the Federal High Court in Abuja, dismissed eight of the 15-count charge.

The appeal, marked CA/ABJ/CR/ 625/2022, is challenging Kanu’s remaining seven counts.

Also see Full List Of Amended Charges FG Filed Against Nnamdi Kanu, Number 2 will shock you

Current Charges against Nnamdi Kanu;

Count 1

The prosecution alleged that Nnamdi Kanu , of Afara Ukwu, Umuhahia North Local Government Area of Abia State, as a member of and leader of proscribed IPOB sometimes in September 2021, committed an act of terrorism against Nigeria and its people by allegedly making a broadcast received and heard in Nigeria with intent to intimidate the population, threatened that the people would die and that the whole world would standstill. The offence is said to be punishable under section 1(2)(b) of the Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act 2015.

Count 2

The prosecution accused him of committing “an act in furtherance of an act of terrorism” against Nigeria and its people made a broadcast received and heard in Nigeria within the jurisdiction of the court with intent to intimidate the population, issued a death threat against anyone who flouted his sit-at-home order.

Nnamdi Kanu allegedly ordered whoever flouted the order should “write his/her will”, and as a result banks, schools, markets, shopping malls, and fuel stations domiciled in the eastern states of Nigeria must not open for business. Citizens, and vehicular movements, in the eastern states of Nigeria, the prosecution said, were grounded as a result of the sit-at-home order.

The prosecution said the offence is punishable under section 1(2)(b) of the Terrorism (Prevention) Amendment Act (2013).

Count 3

The prosecution also alleged that “on diverse dates” between 2018 and 2021 within the jurisdiction of this court, Nnamdi Kanu professed himself to be a member and leader of IPOB, a proscribed organisation in Nigeria.

This, the prosecution said was an offence contrary to and punishments under section 16 of the Terrorism Prevision Amendment Act 2015.

Count 4

Nnamdi Kanu also, allegedly, on diverse dates between 2018 and 2021, made a broadcast received and heard in Nigeria inciting members of the public in Nigeria in furtherance of an act of terrorism against Nigeria and its people to hunt and kill Nigerian security personnel.

The offence, according to the prosecution, is punishable under section 1(2)(h) of the Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act 2013.

Count 5

Nnamdi Kanu , also on diverse dates between 2018 and 2021, allegedly broadcasted furtherance of an act of terrorism against Nigeria and its people, received and heard in Nigeria in furtherance of an act of terrorism, inciting members of the public in Nigeria a to hunt and kill families of Nigeria security personnel.

Pay Attention To Dollar to Naira black market exchange rate today September 13, 2022

The offence is said to be punishable under 1(2)(h) of the Terrorism Prevention Amendment Act 2013.

Count 13

Nnamdi Kanu also alleged between 2018 and 2021 made a broadcast received and heard in Nigeria with intent to incite violence, in furtherance of an act of terrorism against Nigeria and its people, directed members of the public to burn down every federal facility in Lagos resulting in major economic loss to the federal government.

The alleged offences, the prosecution says, are punishable under section 1(2) of the Terrorism (Prevention) Amendment) Act 2013.

 

.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.